The First Counsel

FAQ Center

Foreign Investment & Cross-Border

20 questions, answered in plain language — with the statute named and the caveats stated where verification is pending.

In most sectors, yes — Pakistan's investment policy permits full foreign ownership of a locally incorporated company without a mandatory local partner, as of mid-2026. The exceptions are sector-specific: activities such as banking, insurance, media and certain security-related businesses carry their own licensing regimes, and some of those impose ownership caps or local-participation conditions. The practical question is rarely whether 100% ownership is allowed but what the chosen sector's regulator will require alongside it.

The general regime is open, but regulated sectors sit behind their own statutes and licensing conditions — banking and insurance under their sectoral laws, broadcast media under PEMRA's framework, aviation, and defence-related activities among them, as of mid-2026. Agricultural land ownership also carries long-standing restrictions for foreigners. Because caps and conditions are set sector by sector rather than in one general law, the sector check comes first in any market-entry plan: [SECTOR-SPECIFIC CAPS FOR THE INTENDED ACTIVITY — TO BE VERIFIED BY REVIEWING LAWYER].

The Board of Investment (BOI) is the federal investment-promotion and facilitation agency. For the standard case — a foreign investor subscribing shares in a Pakistani company — no general BOI approval is required, as of mid-2026; the investment proceeds through SECP incorporation and banking-channel remittance. Where BOI does sit squarely in the path is branch and liaison offices of foreign companies, which operate under BOI permission, and in facilitation matters such as work visa recommendations for foreign staff.

A branch office is an extension of the foreign company that can perform commercial activity in Pakistan, but as of mid-2026 branch permission is typically tied to a specific contract or project the foreign company has in the country — it is not a general trading licence. A liaison office is narrower still: it may promote products, build relationships and gather information, but it cannot earn revenue or sign commercial contracts. Both operate under Board of Investment permission granted for a fixed, renewable period, and both remain the foreign parent's legal responsibility rather than a separate legal person.

The application goes to the Board of Investment with the foreign company's charter documents, details of its business and, for a branch, the contract or project that justifies the presence; security clearance of the proposal is part of the process. Permission, once granted, runs for a defined period and must be renewed before expiry. Alongside the BOI permission, the office registers with SECP under the foreign-company provisions of the Companies Act 2017 and completes tax registration — the permission and the registrations are separate steps, not one filing.

No. A liaison office exists to represent and promote the foreign company — market development, coordination with local partners, technical liaison — and its running costs must be met by remittances from the parent, as of mid-2026. Invoicing customers, signing sales contracts or otherwise trading from a liaison office breaches the terms of its permission and creates tax exposure, because the activity starts to look like a taxable business presence. A company that wants revenue in Pakistan needs a branch or, more commonly, a subsidiary.

Where a foreign national or foreign company subscribes shares in a Pakistani company or takes a board seat, the particulars are referred for security clearance processed with the interior authorities — it is a standing feature of foreign-invested incorporations, as of mid-2026. The process runs on government timelines that neither the applicant nor its counsel controls, so it should be built into the market-entry plan rather than discovered inside it: [CURRENT CLEARANCE PROCEDURE, SEQUENCING WITH INCORPORATION, AND TYPICAL DURATION — TO BE VERIFIED BY REVIEWING LAWYER]. Complete, consistent documents — passports, corporate charters, addresses — are the main variable within the applicant's control.

Through the banking channel, into the Pakistani company's account, with the remittance clearly referenced as share subscription. The receiving bank documents the inward remittance — the proceeds realisation certificate is the record you will be asked for years later — and the issue of shares to the foreign investor is reported through the bank under the State Bank's foreign exchange framework. This paper trail is what makes the investment repatriable; money that arrives informally or without proper reporting is the single most common self-inflicted wound in Pakistani FDI.

Yes — for an investment made on a repatriable basis through the banking channel and properly reported, dividends are remittable abroad through an authorised dealer (the company's bank) under the State Bank's foreign exchange framework, subject to tax deduction and the bank's documentation requirements, as of mid-2026. The legal entitlement and the operational timing are different things: in periods of foreign-exchange pressure, banks have processed outward remittances more slowly. The reliable protection is a clean record — proceeds realisation certificate, share issue reporting, tax payment evidence — assembled from day one, not at remittance time.

Disinvestment proceeds — the price received for selling shares in a Pakistani company — are remittable through an authorised dealer where the original investment was made and reported on a repatriable basis, as of mid-2026. The bank will want the original investment record, the sale documents, evidence that the price is supportable, and tax clearance on any gain; valuation support is a standard requirement for unlisted shares [CURRENT VALUATION AND DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS — TO BE VERIFIED BY REVIEWING LAWYER]. Exits fail on paperwork far more often than on principle, which is why the entry-stage records matter so much.

The Foreign Exchange Regulation Act 1947 (FERA) is the statute under which Pakistan controls dealings in foreign currency and foreign securities, administered by the State Bank through its Foreign Exchange Manual and the authorised dealer banks. For a cross-border investor it governs the mechanics that matter most: how money comes in, how shares held by non-residents are recorded, and how dividends, loan repayments and sale proceeds go out. Transactions that ignore FERA do not usually fail loudly at the time — they fail quietly later, when a bank refuses an outward remittance for want of the records the framework required.

Statutory protections exist: the Foreign Private Investment (Promotion and Protection) Act 1976 provides guarantees for approved foreign investment, including against takeover without adequate compensation, and the Protection of Economic Reforms Act 1992 adds protections around remittability, as of mid-2026. Pakistan is also party to bilateral investment treaties with a number of states, which can give investors from those states treaty-based remedies. Which protections apply to a given investor depends on structure and nationality — a point worth checking at structuring stage, not after a dispute starts: [APPLICABLE BIT AND ITS CURRENT STATUS — TO BE VERIFIED BY REVIEWING LAWYER].

Yes, but foreign-currency borrowing by a Pakistani company sits inside the State Bank's framework for private foreign loans: the loan must fit the permitted categories and terms and be registered through the banking system before repayments of principal and interest can be remitted, as of mid-2026 [CURRENT LOAN CATEGORIES, PRICING LIMITS AND REGISTRATION PROCEDURE — TO BE VERIFIED BY REVIEWING LAWYER]. A parent that simply wires money and books it as a loan may find the subsidiary cannot lawfully service it. The equity-versus-debt decision for funding a Pakistani subsidiary is therefore a regulatory question as much as a tax one.

A flip re-organises ownership so that a new foreign holding company — commonly in Delaware, Singapore or the DIFC — sits above the Pakistani operating company, with founders and investors holding shares in the parent. Startups do it because international venture investors overwhelmingly prefer to invest in instruments and jurisdictions they know, and because employee options and future exits are easier to run through the foreign parent. The Pakistani company keeps operating locally as a subsidiary; what changes is where the equity story lives.

Yes — this is the regulatory heart of every flip. Pakistani residents acquiring or holding foreign securities are within the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act 1947, and taking shares in the new offshore parent, including by way of share swap, requires State Bank permission under its framework for equity investment abroad, as of mid-2026 [CURRENT APPROVAL ROUTE AND CONDITIONS — TO BE VERIFIED BY REVIEWING LAWYER]. Flips executed without addressing this leave founders holding foreign shares in breach of exchange control, a defect that surfaces at the worst moments — diligence for the next round, or an exit. The approval work belongs before the flip closes, not after.

Through the same SECP process as any company — name reservation, then the incorporation filing — with a cross-border layer on top: the foreign parent's charter documents and board resolution authorising the subscription must be attested for use in Pakistan, foreign subscribers and directors go through security clearance, and the subscription money must arrive through the banking channel with proper reporting. Because a company needs the minimum number of members, structures commonly include a second, nominal shareholder alongside the parent or use the single-member form. The filings are routine; the sequencing of clearance, attestation and remittance is where timelines are won or lost.

The standard bundle is the parent's certificate of incorporation, charter documents, a board resolution authorising the Pakistani investment and any powers of attorney for local signatories, together with passports of foreign directors. These are notarised in the home jurisdiction and then legalised for Pakistan — traditionally through the Pakistani mission in that country, and increasingly by apostille since Pakistan joined the Apostille Convention [ACCEPTANCE OF APOSTILLE FOR THE SPECIFIC FILING — TO BE VERIFIED BY REVIEWING LAWYER]. Getting the attestation chain right the first time matters because a defective document restarts a cross-border courier loop measured in weeks.

Selling into Pakistan from abroad — exporting goods, providing services remotely — generally requires no local registration. The line is crossed when the foreign company establishes a place of business in Pakistan: at that point the Companies Act 2017 requires registration with SECP as a foreign company within a short statutory window, and a taxable presence question arises with the FBR. Companies drift over this line gradually — a resident employee here, a rented desk there — so the safer discipline is to test the arrangement against the place-of-business threshold before it hardens.

Dividends paid to a non-resident shareholder carry withholding tax at source, and gains on selling shares in a Pakistani company are within the capital gains net, as of mid-2026 — rates depend on the instrument, the holding and the shareholder's profile, and change with Finance Acts, so we do not repeat figures here. Pakistan's double taxation treaties can reduce withholding for investors from treaty states, but relief has to be claimed and documented, not assumed. Tax evidence also feeds directly into repatriation: the remitting bank will want proof that tax on the outflow has been dealt with.

They can be. The Special Economic Zones Act 2012 and the Special Technology Zones Authority Act 2021 create zone regimes offering fiscal incentives — typically around duties on capital equipment and tax treatment for qualifying enterprises — for businesses that locate inside a designated zone and meet the entry criteria, as of mid-2026. The incentives are regime-specific and have been adjusted over time, so current scope should be verified against the zone's own rules before it drives a location decision: [CURRENT ZONE INCENTIVES AND QUALIFYING CONDITIONS — TO BE VERIFIED BY REVIEWING LAWYER]. For most services businesses the zones are an option to evaluate, not a default.

Prepared by The First Counsel · As of 2026-07-12 · Pending professional review — statements flagged in the text are being verified

This publication is provided for general information only. It is not legal advice, and neither reading it nor corresponding with the firm about it creates a lawyer–client relationship. The position stated must be verified against current law before it is relied upon.

Every matter begins with a first conversation.

Contact the Firm