The First Counsel

The Startup Legal Hub

Convertible Notes

A convertible note is a loan before it is anything else — which means Pakistani tax, deposit, and State Bank borrowing rules apply from day one, and the conversion into shares is a second transaction with machinery of its own.

What follows is the position as of July 2026, written for founders deciding how to take early money and for the investors providing it. The State Bank's borrowing framework and the tax rules cited here change often enough that the bracketed confirmations are part of the work, not an afterthought.

A convertible note is a loan with a conversion right stapled to it. That one sentence does most of the analytical work in Pakistan, because everything that is true of a loan — tax on the return, restrictions on who may lend across the border, the creditor's remedies, the possibility of security — is true of the note from the day it is signed, long before anyone thinks about shares. Founders who reach for a note because it feels like "equity later" are often surprised to be running a regulated borrowing in the meantime. Investors who treat it as a SAFE with a deadline are usually the ones who drafted the deadline badly.

Debt first, equity maybe

Between signing and conversion, the noteholder is a creditor. The note is a contract enforceable under the Contract Act, 1872; at maturity the principal, and any accrued return, is a debt the holder can sue for; in an insolvency the holder ranks with the company's unsecured creditors — or ahead of them, if secured — and in every case ahead of the shareholders. This is the note's genuine advantage over a SAFE for the investor, and its genuine burden for the company: the instrument has an ending, and the ending is a liability.

The return needs a design decision at the start. Pakistani practice offers three shapes: a conventional interest coupon; a markup structure, common in local documentation; or a zero-coupon note where the investor's return comes entirely through the conversion discount. The choice drives tax — payments of profit on debt attract withholding under the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, at rates that change with Finance Acts [CURRENT WITHHOLDING PROVISIONS AND RATES — TO BE VERIFIED BY REVIEWING LAWYER] — and it intersects with the wider riba transition in Pakistani law, which remains in motion and should be checked as of the signing date [STATUS — TO BE VERIFIED BY REVIEWING LAWYER]. Many startup notes avoid the entire topic by carrying no running return at all.

One more local threshold question: the Companies Act, 2017 restricts how companies may raise borrowings and deposits, and a friends-and-family note round — many small lenders, loosely papered — is where those restrictions are most likely to bite [APPLICATION TO PRIVATE COMPANY BORROWINGS FROM INDIVIDUALS — TO BE VERIFIED BY REVIEWING LAWYER]. A handful of sophisticated lenders on proper documents is a different instrument, legally, from the same rupees crowdsourced.

Foreign lenders: the State Bank's gate

When the noteholder is outside Pakistan, the note becomes foreign borrowing, and the governing regime is the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 as administered through the State Bank's framework for private-sector foreign currency loans. The framework prescribes the eligible categories of lender, ceilings on pricing, permissible tenors, and — critically — registration of the loan through the company's authorised dealer before the money is drawn [CURRENT FRAMEWORK, INCLUDING ANY STARTUP-SPECIFIC PROVISION FOR CONVERTIBLE DEBT — TO BE VERIFIED BY REVIEWING LAWYER]. Registration is not a stamp of prestige; it is what makes the debt visible to the system that will later have to approve money flowing out. An unregistered foreign note leaves the lender with no reliable path to repayment across the border and no clean path to repatriable shares on conversion, and it leaves the company with an exchange-control defect that every future investor's counsel will find.

Conversion adds a second exchange-control moment. Extinguishing a registered foreign debt in exchange for shares changes the investment's character from loan to equity, and that change must itself be handled through the authorised dealer under the prescribed treatment so that the resulting shares carry repatriable status [CONVERSION MECHANICS UNDER THE FE MANUAL — TO BE VERIFIED BY REVIEWING LAWYER]. Plan both moments at signing. The deals that go wrong here go wrong at the second step, years after everyone stopped paying attention.

Converting the loan into shares

The conversion is a fresh issue of shares by a Pakistani private company, and it passes through the same statutory machinery as any other issue: the pre-emption principle in section 83 of the Companies Act, 2017, the shareholder authority required to issue to an outsider through the prescribed route, authorised capital headroom, allotment, and the return filed with the SECP [MECHANISM UNDER THE FURTHER ISSUE REGULATIONS FOR PRIVATE COMPANIES — TO BE VERIFIED BY REVIEWING LAWYER]. Two features are specific to notes. First, the consideration: the shares are issued against cancellation of the debt rather than fresh cash, which makes the issue one for consideration otherwise than in cash, with its own disclosure and, in some cases, valuation consequences in the filing [REQUIREMENTS — TO BE VERIFIED BY REVIEWING LAWYER]. Second, the arithmetic: the cap and discount set the conversion price by contract, but company law sets a floor — shares generally cannot be issued below face value without satisfying the Act's conditions — so the model should be run at signing to confirm the promised price is lawfully deliverable [DISCOUNT CONDITIONS — TO BE VERIFIED BY REVIEWING LAWYER].

The discipline that makes conversion boring, in the good sense, is front-loading: pass the resolutions and collect the pre-emption waivers when the note is signed, keep the headroom under review as other instruments stack up, and give the conversion a stated timeline with remedies — the Specific Relief Act, 1877 shapes what a court can order in kind — if the company fails to perform.

Maturity without a round

Every convertible note contains a small time bomb, and it is the maturity date. The standard startup assumption — a qualifying round will arrive before maturity — fails often enough that the maturity clause is the most-litigated-in-spirit provision in the instrument, even where nothing reaches a court. When the date arrives with no round closed, the parties hold mismatched positions: the holder owns a debt claim against a company that cannot pay it; the company needs a forbearance the document may not require the holder to give.

Good drafting resolves the standoff in advance by stating the waterfall: extension by mutual consent on defined terms; conversion at maturity into shares at the cap, at the holder's election or automatically; and only then default, with its consequences spelled out. Founders should also resist vanity maturity dates — a twelve-month note signed into an eighteen-month fundraising market schedules its own crisis. And both sides should diarise the date: the cheapest restructuring of a note happens six months before maturity, the most expensive one six days after.

Choosing the note against the alternatives

The note earns its place when its debt nature is a feature: an investor who wants downside standing and a deadline; a bridge into a round already forming, where maturity is a formality; local money, where the exchange-control overlay does not apply and the tax questions are manageable. The SAFE earns its place when the parties want no maturity pressure and accept a pure contractual claim. The priced round earns its place sooner than founders think — once the corporate approvals must be assembled anyway, the incremental cost of pricing the equity honestly can be smaller than the deferred ambiguity of stacked convertibles. And where the investors are foreign funds insisting on native instruments, the real question stops being note-versus-SAFE and becomes whether the company raises through a foreign holding structure at all — a decision with its own exchange-control consequences for resident founders, taken with advice and never by default [HOLDING-STRUCTURE TREATMENT FOR RESIDENTS — TO BE VERIFIED BY REVIEWING LAWYER].

Whichever instrument wins, the same habit applies: model every outstanding convertible at its cap in one fully diluted table, because notes and SAFEs dilute silently until the day they all convert loudly, together, in the round that was supposed to be the easy one.

The Checklist

Convertible note checklist

The points to settle before issuing or taking a convertible note into a Pakistani company.

  • Establish whether the lender is resident or non-resident before drafting anything — the two regimes barely overlap.
  • For a foreign lender, test the note against the State Bank's framework for private-sector foreign currency borrowing — eligible lender categories, pricing ceilings, and tenor — before terms are agreed [CURRENT FRAMEWORK — TO BE VERIFIED BY REVIEWING LAWYER].
  • Register a foreign note through the company's authorised dealer under that framework before drawdown, and file the confirmation in the deal record.
  • Route the loan proceeds through the banking channel to the company's own account, and keep the remittance advice.
  • Decide the return structure — interest, markup, or a zero-coupon discount — and confirm its tax and withholding treatment before signing [CURRENT WITHHOLDING RULES ON PROFIT ON DEBT — TO BE VERIFIED BY REVIEWING LAWYER].
  • Check the note against the Companies Act restrictions on how companies may raise borrowings and deposits, especially for friends-and-family lenders [POSITION — TO BE VERIFIED BY REVIEWING LAWYER].
  • Define the qualified financing trigger as a hard number, and decide now what happens to the note in a round below that number.
  • Set the maturity date with honest reference to your fundraising timeline, then add a margin.
  • Write the maturity waterfall into the document: repayment, extension by consent, or conversion at the cap — in a stated order, at the holder's or company's election as agreed.
  • Run the conversion arithmetic at the cap and the discount, and confirm the implied share price clears the face-value floor.
  • Pass the shareholder authority for the conversion issue under section 83 of the Companies Act 2017 at signing, with pre-emption waivers collected, not promised.
  • Confirm how shares issued against extinguishment of the debt are treated in the return of allotment as consideration otherwise than in cash [DISCLOSURE AND VALUATION REQUIREMENTS — TO BE VERIFIED BY REVIEWING LAWYER].
  • If the note is secured, register the charge with the SECP within the statutory window [FILING PERIOD, HISTORICALLY 30 DAYS — TO BE VERIFIED BY REVIEWING LAWYER].
  • For a foreign lender, confirm with the authorised dealer how the conversion of debt to equity will be reported so the resulting shares carry repatriable status.
  • Stamp the note under the applicable provincial stamp regime at execution.
  • Diarise the maturity date and the first conversation about it at least six months out.

Questions, Answered

What clients ask most.

Not informally. Cross-border lending to a Pakistani company sits inside the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act 1947 and the State Bank's framework for private-sector foreign borrowing, which prescribes who may lend, on what pricing, and requires registration through the company's bank [CURRENT FRAMEWORK — TO BE VERIFIED BY REVIEWING LAWYER]. A note that skips registration may be near-worthless to the lender for repayment or repatriation, and it contaminates the company's diligence record. The framework conversation comes before the term sheet, not after.

Read the document — that is what it is for. A well-drafted note states the waterfall: extension by consent, conversion at the cap at the holder's election, or repayment on demand with default consequences. A badly drafted note leaves the parties to negotiate under threat, where the holder's formal remedy is to sue on the debt and the company's reality is that it cannot pay. Most Pakistani maturity standoffs settle as a negotiated conversion; the drafting determines who negotiates from strength.

In the ordinary commercial frame, yes as of mid-2026 — interest-bearing private debt remains part of Pakistani commercial life, and returns are often documented as markup in local practice. The constitutional and legislative programme on the elimination of riba continues to move and should be checked as of your signing date [STATUS OF THE RIBA TRANSITION AND ANY DATED CONSTITUTIONAL COMMITMENT — TO BE VERIFIED BY REVIEWING LAWYER]. The more immediate points are practical: interest attracts withholding tax, and many startup notes are structured with no running coupon at all, taking the return through the discount instead.

Not an approval of the conversion as such, but the machinery is statutory: shareholder authority for an issue departing from pre-emption under section 83 of the Companies Act 2017, authorised capital headroom, board allotment, and a return of allotment filed afterwards — in which shares issued against cancellation of the debt are consideration otherwise than in cash, with the disclosure that entails [REQUIREMENTS — TO BE VERIFIED BY REVIEWING LAWYER]. Companies that pass the authorities at signing convert in days; companies that defer them convert in months.

Seed-stage convertible notes are usually unsecured — the lender is underwriting the equity upside, not the collateral. Where security is taken, it must be perfected: a charge registered with the SECP within the statutory window, failing which it is at risk against a liquidator [PERIOD — TO BE VERIFIED BY REVIEWING LAWYER]. Founders should also understand what they are granting: a secured noteholder at maturity holds real leverage over the company's assets, not just its cap table.

When the investor wants the discipline of a maturity date and a creditor's claim, when the money is local and the lending-law questions are manageable, or when the parties genuinely intend repayment as a realistic outcome. The note's costs are the tax and regulatory weight of debt and the maturity cliff itself. Where the money is foreign and the intent is purely equity-in-waiting, the comparison is really between an adapted instrument at the Pakistani company and a standard one at a foreign holding company — which is a structuring decision, not a template decision.

The full FAQ Center

Prepared by The First Counsel · As of 2026-07-12 · Pending professional review — statements flagged in the text are being verified

This publication is provided for general information only. It is not legal advice, and neither reading it nor corresponding with the firm about it creates a lawyer–client relationship. The position stated must be verified against current law before it is relied upon.

Every matter begins with a first conversation.

Contact the Firm